Half_Stage_Smart Solutions for Evolving Market Trends in North America_Transporeon
Transportation Roundtable

Smart Solutions for Freight Challenges in North America

We need your consent to load the service "YouTube"!

We use the service of a third-party provider to embed and provide video content. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the data processing by YouTube. You can find out more about the service via "Settings". You can revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future.

Highlights from the Q&A

Small carriers have long been the swing capacity in the market. What impact does the recent shift to even more small carriers have on pricing expectations for shippers and shipper-carrier relationships?

Pricing is set by the market, but smaller carriers might be more aggressive in their pricing as a way to win business. That is why shippers need to think beyond price, as they might be tempted to go with a low-priced carrier but then pay a bigger price with service or safety issues. However, thanks to technology and network-based platforms, finding new carriers of all sizes and onboarding/conducting due diligence on them is easier than in the past. Leveraging AI solutions can also help with carrier profiling, identifying carrier biases and strengths, and setting competitive rates for both parties.

What mid- to long-term mitigation measures and harmonization efforts can be made to secure a win-win scenario and prevent carriers from going out of business, thereby avoiding sudden losses of capacity?

At the end of the day, shippers and carriers both need to take a long-term perspective on relationships. For shippers, this is easier if procurement is conducted by the transportation function rather than corporate procurement, which tends to focus almost exclusively on getting the lowest price. Yes, cost is important, but so are service, safety, reliability, capacity assurance, visibility, and other factors. In short, it is necessary to think beyond cost. Using index-based pricing is another approach to ensure prices stay aligned with market realities, but I haven't seen anyone adopt this approach yet.

Is electrification the future of emissions solutions? I believe the technology is still in the infant stage. There are many low-emissions solutions.

 
 
It is part of the solution, along with hydrogen, natural gas, and other alternative fuels. At the moment, it is best suited for local, short-haul movements. As you noted, battery-powered electric trucks have many drawbacks currently, and the infrastructure to support them doesn't really exist yet — for example, the lack of charging stations and the inability of utilities to meet the growing demand for electricity.
See this post for additional perspective: https://talkinglogistics.com/2023/04/24/electric-freight-trucks-not-happening-anytime-soon-for-long-haul-moves/

I love the phrasing of "adversarial relationship" when discussing the working conditions between carriers and shippers. Could an alternate system possibly be built where this systemic setup could be changed to be more beneficial in current times?

 
 
It's no different from retailers and their suppliers. In both cases, each company is out to maximize financial benefit. We know regulation and price controls aren't good answers. The FTL market is pretty unique in that it has such a long tail. If you look at many other segments of logistics or other industries, consolidation inevitably occurs (ocean, air, banks, etc.). But the individual appeal and low cost of entry into trucking are very unique, and thus the market dynamics will always be different.

At the end of the day, shippers and carriers both need to take a long-term perspective on relationships. For shippers, this is easier if procurement is conducted by the transportation function rather than corporate procurement, which tends to focus almost exclusively on getting the lowest price. Yes, cost is important, but so are service, safety, reliability, capacity assurance, visibility, and other factors. In short, it is necessary to think beyond cost. Index-based pricing is an alternate approach being discussed, but we're still in the early stages of figuring out how to do it.

Shippers are trying to lock in the lower rates with long-term contracts. What will happen when the rates do go up and the long-term contracts are no longer sustainable? Will that not sour the relationships even further?

Big pendulum swings occur in such cyclic industries. When that starts to happen, at first we'll see much higher tender rejection rates, but then we'll get back to a balanced point where things don't favor one side so heavily—for a time. Then the next big external event will happen, and the process begins all over again.

However, smart shippers understand that if their contracted rates get too far below spot rates, they will start to experience a higher rate of tender rejections. The trend in recent years has been to conduct more frequent procurement engagements throughout the year ("mini-bids") to ensure their rates remain aligned with market realities.

We are a broker only and we are paid a set rate for every load from our shipper/customer. By doing this, our rates move with the market, fuel rates, and capacity. Why don't more shippers move to this structure? Is it greed, or is it just the need for dedicated trucks?

Carriers prefer to have direct relationships with shippers and vice versa. Although contracts here in the US are non-binding, they at least provide some structure for "assured" capacity.

Do we see enterprises capitalizing on the nearshoring initiatives to drive progress on the sustainability front, effectively killing two birds with one stone?

As highlighted in the report, here in North America, a growing number of companies are moving their sourcing and manufacturing operations away from China and back to the US or Mexico. In 2023, for the first time in more than two decades, Mexico surpassed China as the leading source of goods imported by the United States. This shift is being driven more by geopolitical and risk management factors (including a rise in import tariffs), but sustainability is certainly a side benefit.

As the movement of freight shifts from the West Coast to the East Coast, and Mexico becomes a stronger player in the market, does New Orleans play a larger role in container movement? Can the Mississippi River system become a larger player in the role of freight movement?

In general, it depends on the specifics of each supply chain (e.g., product types, ship-to/from locations, volume, lead times, etc.) and what the inland waterways can handle, with barges being the common way to move freight.

Freight fraud is a growing problem in the industry. How can shippers and carriers address this problem better? Is this an area where technology can help as well?

As covered in the report, technology also plays an important role in combating freight fraud, including telematics, IoT sensors, real-time freight visibility, and other solutions such as Transporeon’s Trust Center, where carrier profiles "can be created with all the necessary documents, licenses, approvals, and certificates needed to operate as a trusted and compliant partner on the network."

Also, while not foolproof by any means, leveraging technology like carrier scorecarding to mitigate or completely eliminate double brokering is an area some of our customers are also looking at.

There is a lot of buzz and hype around AI at the moment. How is AI actually being used to improve transportation operations?
While generative AI is mainstream, in the transportation industry AI is currently structured around large language models, machine learning, and predictive data analytics. This means AI solutions won't start your tasks but will automate and significantly improve the efficiency and performance of some activities.

At Transporeon, artificial intelligence empowers our solutions with AI-based price predictions, AI-based ETA predictions to improve downstream operations, and carrier behavioral science to pick up on biases and strengths.

TRANSPOREON HUBS

Explore our Transportation Management Platform

BENEFITS

Dock & Yard Management Hub

Headline for Flip 2
  • Bring order to the dock, warehouse and yard with visibility-driven dock scheduling and yard management solutions. 
  • Increase the speed of handling and control downstream processes, boosting productivity by up to 20%.
  • Reduce wait times by up to 30 to 40% and lower detention and demurrage charges.

BENEFITS

Freight Audit & Payment Hub

Headline for Flip 2
  • Automate your freight billing process and stay on top of your freight spend for all modes. 
  • Gain a clear picture of logistic operations based on a single source of audited and indisputable data.
  • Improve cash flow.

BENEFITS

Freight Sourcing Hub

Headline for Flip 2
  • A structured and scalable way to source the right partners for your spot, seasonal and long-term contracts.
  • All modes are all covered, from FTL to LTL, ocean, air and rail. 
  • Easily benchmark your procurement results with peers in your industry.
  • Become part of a global collaboration network.

BENEFITS

Insights Hub

Headline for Flip 2
  • Always stay one step ahead.
  • Gain useful insight into your performance as well as that of your logistics partners.
  • Identify bottlenecks and inefficiencies.

BENEFITS

Transport Execution Hub

Headline for Flip 2
  • Move more freight and worry less. It’s the smartest way from load to asset, and vice versa. 
  • Incorporate spot shipments into your daily tactical execution process and rely on real-time insights.
  • Expand your pool of potential partners.

BENEFITS

Visibility Hub

Headline for Flip 2
  • Real Time Visibility as a companywide capability, rather than a feature. All modes, all covered. 
  • Reduce check calls and automate processes.
  • Reduce wait and dwell times with more accurate ETAs.
  • Reduce CO2 emissions and empty mileage.